{"id":1406,"date":"2019-02-26T20:38:56","date_gmt":"2019-02-27T02:38:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/?p=1406"},"modified":"2020-02-18T20:08:20","modified_gmt":"2020-02-19T02:08:20","slug":"assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/","title":{"rendered":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='content-column one_third'><div style=\"padding-right:10px;\"><div style=\"padding: 8px 5px 5px 5px; background-color: #eeeeee; border: #dddddd 2px solid;\">\n<h4>R\u00e9sum\u00e9<\/h4>\n<p>Au cours d\u2019une radioth\u00e9rapie, le dotatate marqu\u00e9 au Lu-177 est typiquement dilu\u00e9 dans une poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique, puis infus\u00e9 chez le patient par intraveineuse. Une fois administr\u00e9es, la poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique et l\u2019intraveineuse sont rinc\u00e9es pour s\u2019assurer que la dose r\u00e9siduelle soit administr\u00e9e au patient. Toutefois, changer le sac de perfusion dans une seconde poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique augmente le risque de contamination. Christian Detlef Raharja voulait savoir si le fait de rincer l\u2019intraveineuse apr\u00e8s la radioth\u00e9rapie au Lu-177 am\u00e9liore l\u2019administration d\u2019une dose ou si le fait de jeter l\u2019intraveineuse et la poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique constituerait une meilleure pratique.<\/p>\n<p>Cet article sera pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 en trois segments.\u00a0Dans le premier segment, l\u2019auteur d\u00e9crivait sa question et son hypoth\u00e8se de recherche. Dans le deuxi\u00e8me, il en rapportait les proc\u00e9dures et les \u00e9valuations. Dans ce segment final, l\u2019auteur discute des r\u00e9sultats de sa recherche.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<div class='content-column two_third last_column'><div style=\"padding-left:10px;\"><p>by Christian Detlef Raharja<br \/>\nWith contributions by Edward Sun, Judy Gabrys, and Rebecca Wong<br \/>\nThe Michener Institute, University of Toronto<\/p>\n<h1>Background<\/h1>\n<p>When conducting Lu-177 therapy, the Lu-177 dotatate is typically diluted in a saline bag and then infused through an intravenous (IV) line to the patient. After administration, the saline bag and IV line are flushed to ensure the residual dose is administered to the patient. However, changing the infused bag to the second saline bag increases the risk of contamination. The author wanted to know if flushing the line after Lu-177 therapy improves dose administration or if discarding the line and saline bag would lead to better practice.<\/p>\n<p>This paper is presented in three instalments. In the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2018\/11\/07\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose\/\">first instalment<\/a>, the author described his research question and hypothesis. In the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2018\/12\/18\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-second-instalment\/\">second instalment<\/a>, he described the procedures and evaluations. In this final instalment, he discusses the results.<\/p>\n<h1>Results<\/h1>\n<p>After administration of the Lu-177 dotatate, a photograph was taken of the chamber. That photograph was compared to the volume scale used to estimate the volume in the chamber (see Figure 6 in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2018\/12\/18\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-second-instalment\/\">second instalment<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 2:<\/strong> Estimated volume remaining in the chamber and average residual activity after administration of the Lu-177 dotatate.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Number<br \/>\nof Cases<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Volume in the <\/strong><strong>Chamber<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Average Residual Activity<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>17<\/td>\n<td>0.00 mL<\/td>\n<td>4.49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>4.25 mL<\/td>\n<td>8.32<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>8.50 mL<\/td>\n<td>9.99<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Total = 25<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Later in the project, we discovered a way to completely empty the chamber. We attached the patient\u2019s saline bag to the IV pump along with our Lu-177-infused saline bag, then clamped the IV line above the patient\u2019s saline bag to ensure nothing was left in the IV chamber at the end of the administration.\u00a0 As a result, there was no volume left in the chamber in 10 additional cases.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1410\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"3300\" height=\"2550\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8.png 3300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8-300x232.png 300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8-768x593.png 768w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8-1024x791.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-8-520x402.png 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 3300px) 100vw, 3300px\" \/><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><strong>Figure 8: <\/strong>Volume of Lu-177 dotatate and saline remaining in the chamber and the residual activity after administration of the Lu-177 dotatate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>After conducting a bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient test, we found a significant correlation (<em>r<\/em> = 0.97) between the residual dose left in the chamber and the residual dose activity. Converted, the <em>p<\/em>-value was &lt; 0.00001 (<em>p<\/em> &lt;\u00a00.05). An upper-tailed Z-test score was \u221219.9, which led to a <em>p<\/em>-value of &lt; 0.05 (Figure 10).<\/p>\n<div style=\"padding: 10px 10px 0 10px; border: #dddddd 2px solid;\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1414\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/image003.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"86\" height=\"63\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1415\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/image007.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"111\" height=\"63\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1416\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/image005.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"73\" height=\"38\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1417\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/image009.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"73\" height=\"20\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><strong>Figure 9:<\/strong> Upper-tailed Z-test calculation of the residual activity of the Lu-177 therapy cases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The average residual dose from the IV line was below 10% (6.02% \u00b1\u00a02.85%) in the 25 cases measured (Figure 10). There were 22 cases that were under the 10% limit of the study and three cases that exceeded the 10% limit. In the three cases that exceeded the limit, there was more than 4.25 mL remaining in the IV chamber.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1411\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1283\" height=\"907\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10.png 1283w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10-300x212.png 300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10-768x543.png 768w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10-1024x724.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-10-520x368.png 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1283px) 100vw, 1283px\" \/><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><strong>Figure 10:<\/strong> Residual activity of the Lu-177 therapy cases, calculated by assaying the activity in the line and dividing that by the total dose.<\/span><\/p>\n<h1>Discussion<\/h1>\n<p>Our project determined that there was a significant relationship between the volume left in the chamber and the residual activity left in the line. While the remaining volume is measured by visually comparing what is left in the line to the volume scale, the measured data supported our predictions. As such, the volume scale we developed could be a reliable predictor of the percentage of activity remaining in the line.<\/p>\n<p>Our results suggest that if the saline bag and IV line are not flushed, the volume remaining in the IV chamber should be less than 4.25 mL, which would ensure the activity left in the line is than 10%. This would imply that after administering the Lu-177 dotatate through the infused saline bag, one could discard the bag and line without flushing.<\/p>\n<p>Eliminating the flushing step does present a slight risk of under-dosing the patient. In most cases, the residual activity was less than 10% of the administered dose, but we did have some cases where the residual dose was over 10%.<\/p>\n<p>We discovered that clamping the saline bag (which is also on the infusion pump) allows the fluid in the chamber to be completely administered to the patient. If the remaining volume in the IV chamber is 4.25 mL or more, the saline bag should be clamped (as described above) or the IV line should be flushed with a new saline bag.<\/p>\n<p>Skipping the flushing step would also decrease both treatment time and wait time. The added step of flushing the IV line and chamber prolonged the dose administration by nearly 10 minutes on average (Figure 11). When the IV line and chamber were also assayed, it took even more time, almost 18 minutes on average (Figure 11). Patient beds are limited and patients usually have to line up to get into the hospital. This additional time meant patients had to wait longer to be admitted.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1412\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"3300\" height=\"2550\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11.png 3300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11-300x232.png 300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11-768x593.png 768w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11-1024x791.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11-520x402.png 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 3300px) 100vw, 3300px\" \/><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><strong>Figure 11: <\/strong>Extra time (in minutes) taken to complete the extra steps of flushing and assaying the IV line and chamber.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The risk of contamination also increases when flushing is needed. Kumar et al.[<a href=\"#a1\">1<\/a>] described how contamination can result in excess radiation exposure to patients and staff and hinder the workflow of technologists. Early in our project, contamination resulted when a small amount of the residual dose spilled on the injection table when we were flushing the Lu-177 dotatate from the IV line. (See Figure 2 in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2018\/12\/18\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-second-instalment\/\">second instalment<\/a>.) As a result, we had to decontaminate the table and then store the table in a lead-lined room. If a drop were to land on the patient, added measures would have to be taken to ensure the patient\u2019s safety.<\/p>\n<p>Since contamination could result in excess radiation exposure to everyone involved in the trial, eliminating the flushing is even more justified, especially as the dose administered was high (approximately 7.4 GBq).<\/p>\n<p>Contamination also presents the possibility of a false positive. In our study, the injection table was contaminated, but if that droplet had landed on a patient\u2019s gown or another area on their body, a false positive might have resulted when the patient was scanned (approximately four hours later).<\/p>\n<h1>Conclusion<\/h1>\n<p>Our results indicate that the residual dose remaining in the IV line is not significant and flushing is an unnecessary step for Lu-177 dotatate therapies. Eliminating this step would decrease the risk of contamination and increase workflow efficiency.<\/p>\n<h1>Limitations<\/h1>\n<p>We identified several limitations to our study.<\/p>\n<p>After administration of Lu-177 dotatate the volume within the IV chamber might vary. This volume cannot be altered after the administration and can only be eliminated through flushing. A volume scale was created to estimate this variance, but the scale was compared subjectively against a photograph, which was a limitation due to variability in categorization.<\/p>\n<p>Another limitation was the chamber photograph, which could have been taken at different angles, resulting in variation in how the residual volume was approximated according to the scale. Taking the angle into account when taking the photographs limited the variation but did not eliminate it completely.<\/p>\n<p>The sample size of 25 datasets may also be considered a limitation.<\/p>\n<h1>Future direction<\/h1>\n<p>Larger-scale research could further explore the question of whether flushing is necessary. If multiple hospitals collected data on the residual dose left in the IV line, we would have an increased sample size and a more significant study. Although our project concluded that flushing was not a necessary step, our sample size of 25 cases may not have been large enough to warrant changing the Lu-177 dotatate protocol.<\/p>\n<p>Our project could also be used as a precursor to assess exposure rates when administering Lu-177 dotatate therapy. Conducting a study that specifically measures the exposure of the patient and technologist when the IV line is flushed and comparing it to the exposure when the IV line is not flushed could determine if there is a significant difference.<\/p>\n<p>Erwin et al.[<a href=\"#a2\">2<\/a>] concluded that staff involved with Lu-177 dotatate therapy had a significantly higher exposure rate than those who were not involved the therapy. However their study could be expanded to check these rates when flushing is added as a step versus when flushing is omitted from the protocol.<\/p>\n<div id=\"a1\"><\/div>\n<p>1.\u00a0 \u00a0 Kumar, N., et al., 2017. Contamination, a major problem in nuclear medicine imaging: How to investigate, handle, and avoid it.\u00a0<em>Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology<\/em>,\u00a0<em>45<\/em>(3), 241\u2013242.<\/p>\n<div id=\"a2\">\n<p>2.\u00a0 \u00a0 Erwin, W., et al., 2015. External radiation exposures from lutetium-177 dotatate therapy patients.\u00a0<em>Journal of Nuclear Medicine<\/em>,\u00a0<em>56<\/em>(3), 1246.<\/p>\n<div style=\"padding: 10px 10px 0 10px; background-color: #eeeeee; border: #dddddd 2px solid;\">\n<h2><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-1221\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"125\" height=\"125\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner.jpg 443w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner-160x160.jpg 160w, https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/39-5_student-contest-winner-320x320.jpg 320w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 125px) 100vw, 125px\" \/>Christian Detlef Raharja<\/h2>\n<p>Christian Raharja is a nuclear medicine student at the Michener Institute, University of Toronto. His current clinical rotation is within the University Health Network, which includes Toronto General Hospital, Toronto Western Hospital, and SickKids Hospital. His work focuses on creating quality assurance projects to improve the current trials and procedures implemented in the hospitals he works in. His hobbies include weightlifting, cooking, paddling (dragon boat), and travelling.<\/p>\n<p>Christian Raharja \u00e9tudie pr\u00e9sentement la m\u00e9decine nucl\u00e9aire \u00e0 l\u2019Institut Michener de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Toronto. Il effectue pr\u00e9sentement son stage clinique au sein du r\u00e9seau de sant\u00e9 University Health Network, qui inclut le Toronto General Hospital, le Toronto Western Hospital et le SickKids Hospital. Ses recherches sont centr\u00e9es sur la cr\u00e9ation de projets d\u2019assurance qualit\u00e9 afin d\u2019am\u00e9liorer les essais et proc\u00e9dures actuels mis en circuit dans les h\u00f4pitaux o\u00f9 elle travaille. L\u2019halt\u00e9rophilie, la cuisine, le bateau-dragon et les voyages font partie de ses principaux passe-temps.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class='clear_column'><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When conducting Lu-177 therapy, the Lu-177 dotatate is typically diluted in a saline bag and then infused through an intravenous line to the patient. \/ Au cours d\u2019une radioth\u00e9rapie, le dotatate marqu\u00e9 au Lu-177 est typiquement dilu\u00e9 dans une poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique, puis infus\u00e9 chez le patient par intraveineuse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":1438,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles","category-features"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When conducting Lu-177 therapy, the Lu-177 dotatate is typically diluted in a saline bag and then infused through an intravenous line to the patient. \/ Au cours d\u2019une radioth\u00e9rapie, le dotatate marqu\u00e9 au Lu-177 est typiquement dilu\u00e9 dans une poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique, puis infus\u00e9 chez le patient par intraveineuse.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CRPA-ACRP Bulletin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Christian Detlef Raharja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Christian Detlef Raharja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Christian Detlef Raharja\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/165bf6c2a06ec1bb5e4404ff73ed918a\"},\"headline\":\"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1700,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/Figure-11_ftr.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Articles\",\"Features\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/\",\"name\":\"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/Figure-11_ftr.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/Figure-11_ftr.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/Figure-11_ftr.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/2019\\\/02\\\/26\\\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/\",\"name\":\"CRPA-ACRP Bulletin\",\"description\":\"Canadian Radiation Protection Association \\\/ Association canadienne de radioprotection\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association \u2013 Canadienne de Radioprotection\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/cropped-Site-icon-50-80-119.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/cropped-Site-icon-50-80-119.png\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association \u2013 Canadienne de Radioprotection\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/165bf6c2a06ec1bb5e4404ff73ed918a\",\"name\":\"Christian Detlef Raharja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Christian Detlef Raharja\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/christiandetlefraharja\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin","og_description":"When conducting Lu-177 therapy, the Lu-177 dotatate is typically diluted in a saline bag and then infused through an intravenous line to the patient. \/ Au cours d\u2019une radioth\u00e9rapie, le dotatate marqu\u00e9 au Lu-177 est typiquement dilu\u00e9 dans une poche de s\u00e9rum physiologique, puis infus\u00e9 chez le patient par intraveineuse.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/","og_site_name":"CRPA-ACRP Bulletin","article_published_time":"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Christian Detlef Raharja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Christian Detlef Raharja","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/"},"author":{"name":"Christian Detlef Raharja","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#\/schema\/person\/165bf6c2a06ec1bb5e4404ff73ed918a"},"headline":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment","datePublished":"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/"},"wordCount":1700,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png","articleSection":["Articles","Features"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/","name":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment - CRPA-ACRP Bulletin","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png","datePublished":"2019-02-27T02:38:56+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-19T02:08:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Figure-11_ftr.png","width":1200,"height":600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/2019\/02\/26\/assessing-dose-administration-of-lu-177-dotatate-therapy-quantifying-the-residual-dose-third-instalment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Assessing Dose Administration of Lu-177 Dotatate Therapy: Quantifying the Residual Dose, Third Instalment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/","name":"CRPA-ACRP Bulletin","description":"Canadian Radiation Protection Association \/ Association canadienne de radioprotection","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#organization","name":"Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association \u2013 Canadienne de Radioprotection","url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-Site-icon-50-80-119.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-Site-icon-50-80-119.png","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association \u2013 Canadienne de Radioprotection"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/#\/schema\/person\/165bf6c2a06ec1bb5e4404ff73ed918a","name":"Christian Detlef Raharja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9137dc756b248da87b22f50d6ae3642eb39759f3942027a6301b14121d396dc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Christian Detlef Raharja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/author\/christiandetlefraharja\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1406\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crpa-acrp-bulletin.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}